|
|
 |
| “1000
Miles an Hour”
Excerpts
from September, 1946 Air Trails Magazine.
|
Editors Note: The first half of this article gives us a
feel for state of NACA's experimental process in the mid 1940's.
(Before the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA) was formed
in 1958, our technical research organization was NACA, the National
Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.)
Far out of sight of earthbound humans, and “seen” only
by the magic eyes of two special radars, a B-29 Superfortress commences
its bombing run some 40,000 feet over Virginia. From a strange-looking
rack beneath the B-29’s port wing, drops the world’s
fastest “bomb”.
 |
| NACA
supersonic research missile mounted under a B-29 Superfortress |
The electronic gaze of the radars turns from bomber to bomb. Long
and slender and beautifully streamlined, it resembles no bomb ever
dropped. And it behaves unlike any missile ever borne aloft by a
Superfort. By the time the silvery, eight-foot thing is halfway
down in its plunge from the stratosphere, the highly polished missile
is approaching earth at the speed of sound. In a matter of seconds
it attains supersonic speed. With a dull crash, it smashes into
the outer fringe of Langley Field at nearly 900 miles an hour and
buries its broken length 60 feet under ground!
Terrific as the impact had been, there was no explosion. A “bomb”
more in local parlance than actuality, the sleek form with the tiny
tail fins was really a drop-test missile. Instead of explosives,
it had been filled with precision instruments of versatile and compact
design. Now these valuable electronic meters, recorders, and radio
equipment lie buried and shattered in the wasteland back of Langley.
But their brief messages have been sent; their work is finished.
During the few seconds of the descent, these instruments and others,
sent to ground observers, certain data, never available before this
Fall day of 1944. The data was about airflow, shock waves, and other
information about supersonic speed. The transmitter relayed the
data to the ground receiver and its complex instrument panel, through
“radio telemetering,” all this high-speed intelligence
from a sword-like antenna that protruded from the missile’s
tail. And the speeds of the drop had been carefully measured and
recorded by the two tracking radars. Here was vital information,
impossible to attain by any prior means, that enabled the scientists
of the NACA Compressibility Research Division to fathom may long-sought
secrets of speedier flight.
It was this data, plus that gained from subsequent “bombings”
with missiles of assorted shapes and sizes, that led to the starling
predictions by these scientists that supersonic aircraft will be
flying within a few months, and that within three years planes will
be crossing the United States, in two and one-half hours, at speeds
exceeding 1000 miles per hour.
Subsequent research has added even greater credence to these optimistic
predictions. A valuable contribution was made to the NACA research
fund by a project involving a number of terminal-velocity dives
by test pilots of the Flight Research Division in specially equipped
P-51H Mustang fighters whose top speed on the level approaches 480
miles per hour. Tiny scale models of planes, and parts of planes,
were mounted on the topside of the Mustang wing at the exact point
where the airflow speeds up to supersonic velocities during high-speed
dives. Gauges and recorders installed inside the test ship’s
wing, measured and evaluated the behavior of these models in the
accelerated airflow and provided interesting data.
 |
| Models
mounted on the wing of a P-51H Mustang. |
…………… Editor's note: Much
text skipped .................
The second part of this article gives us a good knowledge
of the problems with transonic flight. About one year after this
article was written, NACA's Bell X-1 rocket plane flew faster than
Mach 1.0, the speed of sound.
As most Air Trails Pictorial readers are aware, compressibility
is that condition which presents itself when an airplane or boat
begins to plow up waves in the air or water through which it is
passing at a certain speed, instead of sliding smoothly through
the fluid without kicking up a bow wave or leaving behind it a turbulent
wake. Such disturbance causes drag, alters the flow of the fluid
around the wing or hull, and induces severe buffeting. The amount
of this disturbance varies according to the speed and, equally,
the shape of the plane or ship. A blunt-nosed Liberty Ship, moving
at only five knots, plows up a sizable bow wave; while a sharp-prowed
destroyer creates little or no bow wave at ten knots. The streamlined
P-80 slides through the air without encountering compressibility
effects, where a larger, bulkier plane flying at half the speed
would be practically bulling its way though the air.
Since speed is involved here to a large extent, we use a convenient
decimal called a “Mach number” to express scientifically
the relation of the plane’s airspeed to the speed of sound.
A Mach number of 0.5 is half the speed of sound, and 1.0 equals
the speed of sound. Now sound has nothing to do with how rapidly
or slowly an airplane may fly. But it happens that all the sounds
we hear travels to our ears in a series of pressure waves. All pressure
waves-musical, spoken, or those created by a bomb blast, including
those caused by the movement of an airplane’s wing though
the air, travel at a definite speed. This wave-travel varies according
to the temperature of the air and its density; which is why sea-level
pressure waves move at 764 miles per hour (at 59 degrees F.) but
travel only 664 miles per hour at 40,000 feet where the air is considerable
colder and only on-fourth the density.
…………… Editor's note: we now
know that the speed of sound depends mostly on temperature, and much
less with density .................
One scientist called the conquest of compressibility a “battle
of patterns.” A wing is shaped so that the air flows around
it in a reasonable even pattern that provides pressure against the
underside and a suction area over the topside of the wing. The nature
of this flow pattern, which maintains lift, is complicated by varying
speeds of air flowing over the wing, and by the directions this
air-flow takes. The layer of air (or “streamline”) that
has to curve around the wing’s topside in the same length
of time that a lower streamline passes across the relatively straight
underside, must move at greater speed, since the former travels
further. This is not all. The lower streamline is compressed slightly
as it passes the high-pressure area under the wing, and the upper
layer of air expands somewhat as it flows through the low-pressure
region on top of the airfoil. We see here that, as the air gets
out of the wing’s way to let it pass and then closes in behind
it after the passage, several things happen to the air. Within this
lift-providing pattern are different speeds, differing pressures,
and varying volumes.
These cross-currents extend not only around the wing, but ahead
of it, so that the layers of air, or streamlines, are parted to
prepare for the wing’s entry. As the air begins to flow into
the lift pattern before the wing arrives, the streamlines separate
to let the wing pass freely. A plane flying at subsonic speeds below
0.5 Mach number has a flow pattern well in advance, but the faster
it flies, the closer the plane comes to catching up with its pressure
waves and the air ahead has less advance notice. But air in certain
parts of the plane’s pressure pattern—around the windscreen
and over the topside of the wing, for example—is moving at
a much higher Mach number because it has to flow faster to get around
these protrusions.
Here comes compressibility. Instead of the streamlines’ being
separated, they are crowded together because they are unprepared
for the plane’s entry. They pile up into a show wave not unlike
the ship’s bow wave, and bubble over into a turbulent mass
like a bow wave. A great drag is created which requires a power
increase or additional fuel consumption, out of all proportion to
the possible gain.
 |
| At
slow speed, stream-lines form around the wing's airfoil. |
 |
| Streamlines
turn to shockwaves as airflow, over the wing, accelerates to
the speed of sound. |
 |
| Illustration
of wing and stabilizer sweepback to match the sweep of the mach
cone. |
………………
Editor's note: Much text skipped ..................
Shock waves start practically at right angles to the wing, but
the faster the plane moves, the more the wave fronts slant rearward.
The shock waves also slide further back on the wing. The angle at
which a shock wave leans backward is called the “Mach cone.”
Engineers are outsmarting nature successfully by shaping the wing
to conform with this cone of hard, high-velocity air, which is the
reason for providing the wing with such pronounced sweepback.
 |
| Artists
dramatization of Mach Cones, 1940's style. |
………………
Editor's note: Much more text skipped...........
|
|